Guides

Commissioning technical documentation: scope, process, your input

Anyone who commissions technical documentation usually means the instruction manual – and at best receives more: a risk assessment on which every warning rests, and a technical file that withstands an enquiry by a market surveillance authority. This guide describes what belongs to it, how a commission runs and what nobody but you can supply.

Author
Dr.-Ing. Philipp Schwittek
Reading time
9 minutes
Updated
04. October 2026
The key points
  • “Technical documentation” means two things: the internal technical file for the authorities and the instructions for the user.
  • Both rest on the risk assessment – without it, no warning in the manual can be justified.
  • A service provider writes, structures and compiles. Knowledge of the machine comes from the manufacturer.
  • Responsibility stays with whoever signs the declaration of conformity.
  • Good documentation is recognised not by its volume but by the fact that it matches the machine as built.
01

Two things under one name

The Machinery Directive 2006/42/EC requires two things of the manufacturer. First, a technical file under Annex VII: it demonstrates that the machine meets the requirements, stays in house and is presented only when a market surveillance authority makes a reasoned request. Second, instructions under Annex I section 1.7.4: they go to the user with every machine.

The technical file does not have to exist permanently as a finished folder. It must, however, be capable of being assembled within a reasonable time – by the person named for that purpose in the declaration of conformity. It has to be kept for at least ten years from the date of manufacture; for series production, from the date the last unit was made.

  • General description of the machine and overall drawing, drawings of the control circuits
  • Detailed drawings, calculations, test results and certificates as far as needed for the evidence
  • Documentation on risk assessment: applicable requirements, protective measures taken, residual risks
  • Standards and technical specifications applied, test reports
  • A copy of the instructions and a copy of the EC declaration of conformity
  • Declarations and instructions for bought-in machinery and partly completed machinery
02

The risk assessment is the beginning, not a chapter

An instruction manual written without a risk assessment warns of whatever occurs to the author. That is rarely what needs warning about. A risk assessment to EN ISO 12100 proceeds systematically: determine the limits of the machine, identify hazards, estimate and evaluate risks, take measures – first by design, then by safeguarding and only last by information for use.

What remains after the first two steps are the residual risks. Exactly these belong in the manual, together with the measure the user has to take. A serious commission therefore starts with the question whether a risk assessment exists and whether it matches the machine as built. Where it is missing, it is worked out first – together with the design department, because decisions on protective measures are the manufacturer’s.

03

How a commission runs

The sequence is the same for a one-off machine and for a series; only the depth differs. What matters is the order: the structure of the manual follows from the risk assessment and the intended use, not the other way round.

  • Stocktaking: what exists – drawings, circuit diagrams, supplier documents, earlier manuals – and at which revision?
  • Define use and limits: what is the machine intended for, what expressly not, who operates it?
  • Prepare the risk assessment or reconcile the existing one with the machine as built
  • Outline and draft of the manual, illustrations from the design data
  • Technical review by the people who know the machine, and incorporation of corrections
  • Release by the manufacturer, compilation of the technical file, declaration of conformity
  • Translation into the languages of the countries of use, and upkeep across revisions
04

What only the client can supply

A service provider can write, structure, illustrate and know the standards. What it cannot know is how the machine was actually built and how it behaves in operation. The more complete the input, the less is guessed – and the shorter the technical review at the end.

  • Design data and drawings at the current revision, parts lists
  • Electrical, pneumatic and hydraulic diagrams
  • Instructions and declarations for bought-in components
  • Details of transport, installation, connection data and commissioning
  • Maintenance tasks with intervals, wear parts and safety-related spare parts
  • A contact person who can answer questions and is allowed to decide
05

How to recognise good documentation

The first sign is unspectacular: the manual describes the machine that was delivered – with its options, its control panel, its guards. A manual that describes three variants at once and leaves the choice to the reader misses its purpose.

The second: it is organised by tasks, not by assemblies. The operator looks for “changing the tool”, not for “assembly 4”. The third: every warning can be traced back to a line of the risk assessment, names the hazard, the consequence and the remedy – and stands where the action is described. The fourth: the manual carries a revision that belongs to the machine. Check these four points on a draft and after half an hour you know what you have in front of you.

06

Partly completed machinery, assemblies of machines, modifications

Not every product receives a declaration of conformity. Partly completed machinery – for instance a unit that is built into a plant only at the customer’s site – is supplied with a declaration of incorporation and assembly instructions; its technical documentation follows Annex VII part B.

Where several machines are linked into an assembly that functions as an integral whole, whoever puts the assembly together is the manufacturer of that assembly – with a risk assessment of its own for the interfaces and documentation of its own. And anyone who modifies an existing machine so that new hazards arise or risks increase has to examine whether this amounts to a substantial modification. These three cases should be settled before commissioning, because they determine the scope.

07

Keeping the Machinery Regulation in view

From 20 January 2027 the Machinery Regulation (EU) 2023/1230 applies and replaces the Machinery Directive. The basic logic stays: risk assessment, technical documentation, instructions, declaration of conformity. Among the changes, instructions may be provided digitally under certain conditions, and substantial modification is expressly regulated.

For documents produced now this means they should be built so that the transition is a revision and not a rewrite. Which regime applies to a specific machine depends on when it is placed on the market.

Overview

Which document is meant for whom

Document Recipient Supplied with the machine Basis
Technical file Market surveillance, on reasoned request no Annex VII part A
Instructions User and operating staff yes, with every machine Annex I section 1.7.4
EC declaration of conformity User, authority yes Annex II part 1 section A
Declaration of incorporation Manufacturer of the final machine yes, for partly completed machinery Annex II part 1 section B
Assembly instructions Manufacturer of the final machine yes, for partly completed machinery Annex VI
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions about Commissioning technical documentation

Do I have to hand the technical file over to my customer?

The Machinery Directive does not require it. Instructions and the declaration of conformity have to be supplied; the technical file stays with the manufacturer and is presented to an authority on reasoned request. Anything handed over beyond that – drawings, parts lists, circuit diagrams – is a matter for the contract.

Can documentation be prepared afterwards for a machine that has already been built?

Yes, technically that is possible. You should simply know what may happen: a risk assessment produced after the build occasionally finds hazards that have not yet been solved by design. Then it is not the manual that is adapted but the machine.

We build machines only for our own production. Does this apply to us too?

Yes. The Machinery Directive also covers machinery that someone manufactures for their own use; putting into service takes the place of placing on the market. Risk assessment, technical file, instructions and declaration of conformity are required in that case as well.

How long does it take?

That depends less on the size of the machine than on the state of the documents. With current design data, diagrams and a risk assessment in place, the manual is editorial work. If the risk assessment is missing or the machine as built deviates from the drawings, that is where the effort arises. A reliable statement is possible after the stocktaking.

In which languages must the instructions be available?

In the official language or languages of the Member State in which the machine is placed on the market or put into service. If no original instructions exist in that language, a translation has to be supplied – together with the original.

About the author

Dr.-Ing. Philipp Schwittek

Managing Director, Entracon Planungsgesellschaft mbH

Engineer with a doctorate, specialising in plant engineering, digital design and process automation – from simulation through to commissioning.

  • Sizing
  • Design
  • Plant engineering
  • Standards and safety
Contact

Still a question open?

A short conversation usually settles more than three quotations. You reach an engineer directly, not a queue.

Reach Entracon

How can we help?

Chat is not staffed right now. We are back for you tomorrow from 08:00. Just request a call-back – we'll get back to you.
Send an e-mail info@entracon.de
Or call us directly +49 234 5414010