Guides

Assessing lifting and carrying – the key indicator method in practice

The question “how much may a person lift?” has no number as its answer – at least none written into law. German load handling regulations require an assessment, and the key indicator method is the procedure used to make it. Knowing it means arguing from facts rather than feelings.

Author
Dr.-Ing. Philipp Schwittek
Reading time
9 minutes
Updated
05. September 2026
The key points
  • No statutory limit in kilograms exists – what is required is an assessment of the workstation.
  • The key indicator method rates load weight, posture, execution conditions and time share together.
  • The weightings produce a risk score falling into four bands – from band 3 onwards action is called for.
  • Frequency beats weight: twenty kilograms four hundred times is more critical than eighty kilograms twice.
  • Technical measures take precedence over organisational ones, and those over personal ones.
01

What the regulation actually requires

German load handling regulations oblige the employer to avoid manual load handling where possible – and, where it is unavoidable, to assess and reduce the risk. Deliberately, no number is given: twenty kilograms handled upright, close to the body, twice a day is something other than the same twenty kilograms in trunk flexion, with outstretched arms, four hundred times a shift. That difference is exactly what the key indicator method captures.

02

The four indicators, step by step

The data is gathered at the workstation, not at a desk. Each indicator carries a weighting; multiplied by the time share it yields the risk score.

  • Load weight – the mass actually handled, weighted by sex
  • Posture – upright, bent, twisted, kneeling or above shoulder height
  • Execution conditions – space, floor, lighting, grip on the load
  • Time weighting – number of operations or duration per working day
  • Result: a risk score placed in four bands from low to high
03

How to read the result

Band 1 counts as low strain, band 2 as increased: a review makes sense for less resilient employees. Band 3 is substantially increased – measures are indicated. Band 4 counts as high: measures are required. What matters equally is what does not follow: a score in the green band is no licence when employees report complaints. The method is an aid to assessment, not a substitute for it.

04

The three mistakes we see most often

First, frequency is underestimated: the time share enters the risk score in full, and it is exactly what gets talked down when estimating. Second, part weight is entered instead of the mass actually handled – carriers, grip aids and tools count too. Third, the assessment is made once and filed: if cycle, part or layout change, the score changes, and the assessment has to be updated.

05

What follows from a high score – in this order

German occupational safety law sets a hierarchy. First, check whether manual handling can be eliminated entirely – through conveying, different presentation or a changed sequence. Where it cannot, technical aids follow: lifting aid, manipulator, lift table, tipper. Only then come organisational measures such as rotation and breaks, and last personal ones such as instruction. In practice this order is often reversed – instruction is cheap, but it changes nothing about the risk score.

Overview

Risk bands and what they mean

Band Classification What to do
1 Low No measures required
2 Increased Review for less resilient employees; redesign advisable
3 Substantially increased Measures indicated – technical ones first
4 High Measures required; redesign the workstation
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions about Risk assessment: lifting and carrying

How much may a person lift?

There is no statutory limit. What is required is an assessment of the actual workstation; the key indicator method is the recognised procedure. As rough orientation: from 15 to 20 kg with frequent repetition and from 25 kg for single lifts a closer look is worthwhile – considerably earlier with unfavourable posture.

Who may carry out the assessment?

The employer is responsible. It is usually carried out by the occupational safety specialist together with supervisors and employees from the area; the occupational physician is to be involved. External support is permitted and common – responsibility stays with the company.

How often does it have to be repeated?

There is no fixed interval but a clear trigger: at every material change of part, cycle, layout or aid, after an accident or on indications from occupational health care. In practice a review every two to three years is usual.

Does a lifting aid replace the assessment?

No – it changes it. After introducing an aid the assessment has to be updated; that is where it shows whether the indicators really improved. It is also the most honest evidence that the investment worked.

About the author

Dr.-Ing. Philipp Schwittek

Managing Director, Entracon Planungsgesellschaft mbH

Engineer with a doctorate, specialising in plant engineering, digital design and process automation – from simulation through to commissioning.

  • Sizing
  • Design
  • Plant engineering
  • Standards and safety
Contact

Still a question open?

A short conversation usually settles more than three quotations. You reach an engineer directly, not a queue.

Reach Entracon

How can we help?

Chat is not staffed right now. We are back for you on Monday from 08:00. Just request a call-back – we'll get back to you.
Send an e-mail info@entracon.de
Or call us directly +49 234 5414010